RSS
Twitter
NYSE
PZG Last 1.34  Change 0.02  Volume 194,459
TMX
PZG.TO  Last 1.38   Change 0.02  Volume 1,950
Home > Projects > Mill Creek

Mill Creek Project, Lander County, Nevada

Paramount Gold and Silver Corp. owns 100% of the Mill Creek Property strategically located along the prolific Battle Mountain-Cortez-Eureka Mineral Belt, approximately 20 km northwest of the Pipeline/Cortez Mine Complex, 25 km southeast of Newmont’s Phoenix mine and 35 km southeast of the Battle Mountain Mine. The project is comprised of 36 unpatented lode mining claims in the Shoshone Range, Lander County, Nevada. Access is by good paved and graded dirt roads.

The Mill Creek Property and area has been explored for gold and barite by several companies (Billiton, Nerco-Alta, BHP) and most recently by Paramount’s predecessor, X-Cal Resources. The primary targets at Mill Creek are Carlin style disseminated and skarn-hosted gold mineralization. Previous exploration was designed to reach the favorable carbonate rocks of the Lower Plate.  Future exploration will continue to target the Lower Plate rocks, but will also target zones of structural preparation in the siliceous rocks of the Upper Plate.  The phrase “lower plate window” refers to areas on the Battle Mountain and Carlin Trends where normally deeper rocks have been thrust to surface or near surface. Many of the most productive gold deposits on these trends occur in the lower plate rocks.

A Technical Report written for X-Cal Resources in 2005 by Richard Redfern of Elko, Nevada and a NI 43-101 “Qualified Person” summarizes the regional and project area geology and describes some of the exploration activities undertaken on the property prior to X-Cal. The 2005 Technical Report describes geologic mapping, soil sampling, rock sampling and a total of 26 drill holes.  Several of the historic drill holes were reported to have gold mineralization (see table below).  X-Cal subsequently completed 5 RC holes and 6 core holes widely distributed across the property. 

Based on a recent review and interpretation of the historic data, the hydrothermal alteration and gold mineralization encountered in the historic surface exploration and drilling is likely associated with major N, NW and NE trending structures.

Drill Hole Summary (McGibbon, 2011)

Table 2: Mill Creek Drill Hole Summaries 21 Nov '11 DHM
Drill hole T.D. (ft) From (ft) To (ft) Interval (ft) Au ppb Au oz/ton Comments
B-86-1 ? No Data
B-86-2 ? No Data
B-86-3 ? No Data
B-86-4 ? No Data
BMC-93-1 325 Abandoned short of targets
BMC-93-1A 385 265 275 10 0.527 Abandoned short of targets; 10' >0.5 opt Au plus 40' lower grade. (Nerco, quoted in BHP report)
260 300 51-471 0.002-0.02
BMC-93-3 865 260 300 40 0.012 Interval was in qz-ser-(10%)py alt'd Ov slstn and metabasalt. Tqp dike 305-312'. Hole was cut for budget. T.D. probably near RMT
260 380 120 46-488
BMC-93-4 545 100 160 60 38-80 Abandoned short of target. Tqp dikes at 340-345' and 525-530'. All Ov but some calcareous siltstone intervals present.
300 360 60 34-36
460 520 60 28-40
BMC-93-6 665 220 280 60 32-162 Abandoned short of target. All Ov. Numerous faults in hole.
460 520 60 28-66
560 580 20 28
640 660 20 28
BMC-94-7 760 No data reported by Redfern but reported to be very weakly minz'd in faulted Ov.
BMC-94-8 1600 Only BHP hole to reach lower plate (at 1250'). High As below thrust.
MC-88-1 500 DSrm at 245'. Qz/py at 245' in alt'd DSrm (Nerco quoted in BHP report).
MC-88-2 500 10 30 20 0.01 Collared in Ovmb; DSrm at 110'?, Ohc at 440'. (Nerco, quoted in BHP report)
MC-88-3 500 ? 100-160 0.003-0.005 DSrm at 170'?. (Nerco, quoted in BHP report)
XMC-1C 850 252 285 33 59 0.002 Dacite 675-685', 715-720'; bottomed in Ov so short of target
XMC-2C 1412 500 525 25 64 0.002 Intrusive 60-65', strongly sheared upper plate 470-665' then Dw? carbonate/marble to EOH; local pyrrhotite skarn development.
640 665 25 148 0.004
XMC-3 700 120 140 20 34 0.001 Intr? 230-240', local "skarn" but Ov to EOH
XMC-4 230 80 110 30 53 0.002 All Ov upper plate
XMC-5 1140 210 230 20 36 0.001 Grn ser alt'd intr 450-460', 470-500', lower plate at ±540'?
XMC-6 1200 410 420 10 22 0.001 Hornblende porphyry 240-280', lower plate at 300', mostly skarn 480-1040', LS to EOH.
XMC-7 1000 40 90 50 286 0.008 Tuff 40-90', 110-130'.Tuffaceous intrusive? 550-560', grn gy intrusive 610-650'. All upper plate? Lithologies except limey mudstn 840-915'.
130 170 40 93 0.003
XMC-7C 1612 130 180 50 78 0.002 Lapilli tuff 10-95', barite at 155', very broken/sheared 105-255' and 290-545', Lower plate starts skarn 542-615', most of hole very strongly borken/sheared/bxa'd. Hbl diorite 1385-1410' and locally below there incl.1590-1612' EOH.
455 490 35 143 0.004
XMC-8C 1093 35 65 30 131 0.004 Stratigraphy not clear from descriptions."Dike" 280-285'. Lower plate contact at 519', dolomite, then LS. "Intrusive dike" 680-685'. Diabase dikes 815-825, 850-870, 925-950'
130 180 50 182 0.005
315 335 20 101 0.003 Note: lost core 300-315'
605 615 10 79 0.002
XMC-9C 1483 160 190 30 217 0.006 Stratigraphy not clear from descriptions. Marble at 1415' but goes back to qzt. A lot of carbon and crushed zones throughout hole. Interval of 0.006 opt Au is Ov fault.
355 395 40 114 0.003
455 470 15 406 0.012
522.5 523.5 1 1045 0.03 Fault zone in Ov
530 531 1 582 0.017
705 720 15 447 0.013 Note: 10' lost core in interval
750 805 55 50 0.001
880 885 5 124 0.004
XMC-10C 1700 60 65 5 134 0.004 Lower plate probably at 1366'. "Lapilli tuff" 390-420', 560-585'. Porphyry 670-770'. Logged as mostly bxa 830-1105'.and 1315-1375' then into limestone. Enter lower plate 1375', becomes marbley 1530' to EOH in Ohc?. Py and C present.
105 125 20 96 0.003
140 145 5 211 0.006
495 510 15 209 0.006
550 590 40 174 0.005
630 640 10 254 0.007
715 720 5 145 0.004
770 795 25 78 0.002
835 850 15 86 0.003
1010 1030 20 80 0.002

Reference Cited: McGibbon, Douglas H., 2011, Mill Creek Summary Report; McGibbon Consulting LLC,

Cautionary note to US Investors

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission limits disclosure for U.S. reporting purposes to mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. We use certain terms on this website, such as "reserves", "resources", "geologic resources", "proven", "probable", "measured", "indicated", or "inferred", which may not be consistent with the reserve definitions established by the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 10-k. You can review and obtain copies of these filings from the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml